点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
春运10天北京铁警破获各类案件104起 抓获网逃人员50人******
中新网北京1月17日电 (邓有林 郭超凯)2023年春运于1月7日开始。记者从北京铁路公安局获悉，自1月7日至1月16日，春运10天来该局共破获各类案件104起，刑事拘留2人，行政拘留11人，抓获网上在逃人员50人，帮助旅客找回遗失遗落行李物品170余件，价值32.2万余元。
春运期间，北京铁路公安处在北京七大火车站增派警力，加强巡逻巡视，提高站区见警率、民警管事率，并围绕“平安一号”专项行动，加大对网上在逃人员的查缉力度，全面营造和谐有序的站车环境。
1月13日17时许，网上在逃人员韩某在北京站检票进站时，被北京站派出所民警当场查获。经查，韩某因涉嫌拒不支付劳动报酬案被江苏省兴化市公安局上网通缉，目前韩某已被移交当地公安局。1月14日8时许，清河站派出所民警在站区一楼进站口执勤时，将网上在逃人员张某抓获。经查，张某因涉嫌诈骗案被浙江省景宁畲族自治县公安局上网通缉，后张某被移交该公安局进一步处理。
1月8日，天津铁路公安处天津站派出所民警将代买火车票收取好处费的男子刘某抓获，民警进行审讯 北京铁路公安局供图据天津铁路公安处相关负责人介绍，春运以来，天津各大火车站派出所以保障旅客人身财产安全为出发点，联合刑警、治安等部门部署便衣警力深入站区，加大对各类违法违治行为的打击力度，守护广大旅客旅途平安。
1月8日18时许，男子刘某在天津站广场通过搭讪，以代买火车票为由，先后收取两名旅客好处费共250元，被天津站派出所便衣民警当场抓获。后刘某因扰乱公共场所秩序，被天津铁路警方依法行政拘留十日。
围绕“我为群众办实事”主题活动，石家庄铁路公安处号召广大一线民警走近旅客群众身边，让执勤民警成为“流动报警点”，快速高效为旅客排忧解难，切实提高旅客安全感、满意度。
1月13日18时许，石家庄站派出所民警接到旅客沈先生报警。沈先生称过完安检后，装有13张美金、100张外币和笔记本电脑的黑色背包不翼而飞。接警后，民警立即展开工作，迅速联系到了错拿沈先生背包的女旅客谭某，由于谭某已乘坐T49次列车离开，谭某将背包交由乘警带回归还沈先生。
临近春节，护航旅客返乡“团圆路”，北京铁路警方还将持续加强对霸座占座、醉酒滋事、动车吸烟等违法犯罪行为的打击力度，全力保障列车行车安全，广大旅客合法权益不受侵害。
1月12日14时许，在六安开往北京南站的G2554次列车上，男子胡某在列车卫生间内“过烟瘾”触发烟雾报警器报警，列车抵达北京南站后，胡某被北京铁路警方处以行政拘留五日的处罚，并被列入铁路失信人员名单。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)